Ah, that'll be useful. The hardest thing about adding a new project to my site is finding a new HyperCard/System 6 icon. https://mk.gg/
heliumtera 3 days ago [-]
Hey, I really loved the fonts on your website.
For the past 10 years I've being using terminus bitmap font, so I have strong opinions about it. The only reason I prefer Firefox is because it supports bitmap.
Reading your website on my phone made my day! Lovely fonts/aesthetics
bensyverson 3 days ago [-]
Wow, I must be in my 40s because I love your site :)
ascorbic 3 days ago [-]
Did you find the "hot corner" though?
bensyverson 2 days ago [-]
omg immediate nostalgia. I can still picture the After Dark floppies!
zahlman 3 days ago [-]
I get that I'm critiquing you within your apparent wheelhouse, but this aesthetic also matters a lot to me.
I understand the goal here, but it works really poorly IMO when the source images are generally 32x32 (and some of them are smaller to arbitrary degrees because the content has been cropped — this doesn't seem to distort aspect ratios, but e.g. the "eye" icon gets stretched to fill the space, and thus scales with a bespoke 48/25 factor). Meanwhile the hover cursor looks pixel-precise, but definitely too big compared to the icons. (It seems to have been scaled 2x ahead of time, from an authentic 16x16.) The background scale is also pixel-precise (I don't know whether it's 2x scaled just to scale it, or to look like a 2x2 "pattern") so the difference in approaches is just really jarring to me.
(I think the font is also doing some anti-aliasing; probably can't really control that. It looks really cool, though.)
I would really recommend not cropping to content, and either using integer-scale boxes or just accepting some sampling interpolation. Or just leaving everything at 1:1 scale. It'd be noticeably physically smaller than authentic for typical desktop displays, but that's just hardware doing what it does. (And as it stands, it might be bigger than authentic!) Bonus points for a `@media` query on device resolution to make the choice.
As I mentioned, images are the hardest to do because beyond the core icons, the available graphics vary massively in size. Displaying them at "actual size" makes them far too small to be usable on a modern screen. I think you're also probably misremembering the scale of the cursor. It's not perfect, but it's not meant to be 16x16. Take a look at https://hcsimulator.com/
The approach I took is the best I could manage without hand-modifying every image. You're right that some of them are not as good as they should be. The ones that I did hand-make (the background, as you noticed, and the window chrome) are the ones that are pixel-perfect.
The fonts took a lot of work to control the anti-aliasing. You'll see they vary quite a bit between monitors, OSs and browsers. Generally they look best in Firefox on a Mac retina display, because that's what I created them in.
zahlman 3 days ago [-]
> Displaying them at "actual size" makes them far too small to be usable on a modern screen
Man, I have ancient (er, well, that's a bit awkward in context!) stuff, I know. But these things are still just fine at ~96dpi IMO.
> I think you're also probably misremembering the scale of the cursor. It's not perfect, but it's not meant to be 16x16.
I recall 16x16 cursors (System 6 CURS resource) and 32x32 icons, so I expect the cursor to be visually 1/2 the height/width of the icons. You have it effectively at 2/3.
> on a Mac retina display
These basically don't exist in my world. But again (or maybe I was unclear?), @media queries can check for dpi and not just viewport size.
doawoo 3 days ago [-]
We need a modern HyperCard, I want to see more creative computing
Doesn’t really seem to get “it” to be a successor, or even a new VisualBasic.
hyperhello 3 days ago [-]
There is this thing called the World Wide Web that does most of that.
yjftsjthsd-h 3 days ago [-]
The web is sort of like hypercard, but it's not the same; in particular, the ease of creating things in hypercard is the important thing about it, and AFAIK that remains unmatched.
NetMageSCW 2 days ago [-]
Exactly - the Web is a PDF. Hypercard is a Word document.
hyperhello 2 days ago [-]
As someone who knows rather a lot about HyperCard: it was never allowed or positioned to fulfill its potential. There were easily fixable security issues ruining the opportunity to be the center of OS scripting. The UI was never rewritten for color and to match the Mac UI, which would not have been complicated either. The code must have been very difficult to upgrade, either technically or organizationally, because the entire upgrade run past 2.0 was so meager. It was a piece of genius, but in the end, only a piece.
NetMageSCW 2 days ago [-]
A long term goal of mine, but I would create a desktop application as I don’t think there’s enough focus on those any more.
doawoo 2 days ago [-]
I would love a local-first app, publish to web sure! but local first editor would be fantastic imo
escapecharacter 3 days ago [-]
in progress ;)
colinbartlett 3 days ago [-]
HyperCard was definitely my first taste of what would become my career in web software development.
I wasn't a Mac user at home, but school had them and I absolutely loved what I could create with HyperCard, there was nothing like it on Windows.
I also recall switching to SuperCard simply for the COLOR support, what a time.
joshstrange 2 days ago [-]
I so wish the author had made their screenshot at the top an image map so you could click on the icons to jump to each section below. But so cool!
I loved playing with HyperCard in elementary/middle school before I moved on to coding and saw what was possible there. But HyperCard will always hold a special place in my heart.
EDIT: Ok, I couldn't help myself, this [0] will inject the image map into the page (paste it into your console). Don't worry, it's simple and easy to read what it's doing). Video of what it looks like once injected: https://cs.joshstrange.com/t1T3KGxF
For the past 10 years I've being using terminus bitmap font, so I have strong opinions about it. The only reason I prefer Firefox is because it supports bitmap.
Reading your website on my phone made my day! Lovely fonts/aesthetics
(I think the font is also doing some anti-aliasing; probably can't really control that. It looks really cool, though.)
I would really recommend not cropping to content, and either using integer-scale boxes or just accepting some sampling interpolation. Or just leaving everything at 1:1 scale. It'd be noticeably physically smaller than authentic for typical desktop displays, but that's just hardware doing what it does. (And as it stands, it might be bigger than authentic!) Bonus points for a `@media` query on device resolution to make the choice.
(Edit: after reading through https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Reference/P... I'm not really sure Firefox is working as advertised...? But I think x1.5 scaling for pixel art is always going to involve compromise.)
The approach I took is the best I could manage without hand-modifying every image. You're right that some of them are not as good as they should be. The ones that I did hand-make (the background, as you noticed, and the window chrome) are the ones that are pixel-perfect.
The fonts took a lot of work to control the anti-aliasing. You'll see they vary quite a bit between monitors, OSs and browsers. Generally they look best in Firefox on a Mac retina display, because that's what I created them in.
Man, I have ancient (er, well, that's a bit awkward in context!) stuff, I know. But these things are still just fine at ~96dpi IMO.
> I think you're also probably misremembering the scale of the cursor. It's not perfect, but it's not meant to be 16x16.
I recall 16x16 cursors (System 6 CURS resource) and 32x32 icons, so I expect the cursor to be visually 1/2 the height/width of the icons. You have it effectively at 2/3.
> on a Mac retina display
These basically don't exist in my world. But again (or maybe I was unclear?), @media queries can check for dpi and not just viewport size.
[0] https://breadboards.io/
A surprising prescient discussion on HyperCard and hypertext.
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/mac-folklore-radio/id1...
I wasn't a Mac user at home, but school had them and I absolutely loved what I could create with HyperCard, there was nothing like it on Windows.
I also recall switching to SuperCard simply for the COLOR support, what a time.
I loved playing with HyperCard in elementary/middle school before I moved on to coding and saw what was possible there. But HyperCard will always hold a special place in my heart.
EDIT: Ok, I couldn't help myself, this [0] will inject the image map into the page (paste it into your console). Don't worry, it's simple and easy to read what it's doing). Video of what it looks like once injected: https://cs.joshstrange.com/t1T3KGxF
[0] https://gist.github.com/joshstrange/6ea1fb4b64b39ee410e2bd6f...
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myst#:~:text=The%20game%20was%...
Feel like I saw this many years ago but totally worth a re-watch.